43 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Rajkumar G commented  ·  March 21, 2012 2:00 p.m.  ·  Delete

  Would be helpful to tweak the performance

• Alexey commented  ·  October 28, 2011 6:41 a.m.  ·  Delete

  Parallel Programming in SL - it would be nice to have.

• LaughingJohn commented  ·  September 14, 2011 3:42 a.m.  ·  Delete

  TPL is included in SL5. Don't think PLINQ or Parallel loops (For/ForEach) is included though.

• Dimitar N. L. commented  ·  August 30, 2011 11:31 p.m.  ·  Delete

  You should include this feature in SL5.

• Dimitar N. L. commented  ·  August 30, 2011 11:30 p.m.  ·  Delete

  You should include this feature in SL5.

• LaughingJohn commented  ·  August 23, 2011 3:42 a.m.  ·  Delete

  For anyone looking for this, you can get access to tasks (although not Parallel.For or concurrent collections) via the Async CTP, available here: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=9983

  There's a go-live license as well.

• LaughingJohn commented  ·  August 23, 2011 3:40 a.m.  ·  Delete

  +100

• Alireza commented  ·  July 20, 2011 8:29 p.m.  ·  Delete

  You should include this feature in SL5.

• Brij Mohan commented  ·  July 11, 2011 3:10 a.m.  ·  Delete

  This is one of the missing must have feature in SL.

• iS * commented  ·  June 24, 2011 3:31 a.m.  ·  Delete

  Really gr8 to have this in SL5

• User239 commented  ·  June 12, 2011 1:00 p.m.  ·  Delete

  Looking forward!

• Ba Bil commented  ·  June 1, 2011 3:57 a.m.  ·  Delete

  Should already be in SL5.

• qxsar commented  ·  April 14, 2011 6:10 a.m.  ·  Delete

  I can't believe it's still not gonna make it into SL5..

• Jeeradej commented  ·  April 12, 2011 2:43 p.m.  ·  Delete

  The inclusion of these features is a must for Silverlight!

• ludo commented  ·  March 16, 2011 6:13 a.m.  ·  Delete

  yes

• Steve Solomon commented  ·  January 17, 2011 4:38 a.m.  ·  Delete

  What gives, not TPL in Silverilght. Doh

• Dan commented  ·  January 14, 2011 1:14 a.m.  ·  Delete

  Anything to make client-side threading easier to read would be a bonus

• Anonymous commented  ·  December 16, 2010 7:53 a.m.  ·  Delete

  This will be a wonderful addition whenever it happens. For the least bit, it will ease using the hideous WCF proxy async methods.

• Crash commented  ·  December 10, 2010 1:40 p.m.  ·  Delete

  This would be a very welcome feature.

• jonny64bit commented  ·  November 23, 2010 7:23 a.m.  ·  Delete

  This would be create in my applications