12 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Eugene Tolmachev commented  ·  October 10, 2012 5:45 a.m.  ·  Delete

  Better support for async tests: http://devlicio.us/blogs/christopher_bennage/archive/2011/01/17/improving-asynchronous-tests-for-silverlight.aspx

• Mark Heath commented  ·  July 6, 2011 8:24 a.m.  ·  Delete

  And code coverage support too

• Jeff Circeo commented  ·  February 20, 2011 7:14 a.m.  ·  Delete

  mnikoo, i couldn't have said it better and if I could add all my votes I would.

• mnikoo commented  ·  February 19, 2011 3:52 a.m.  ·  Delete

  LOB application development is becoming one of the major usage scenarios for Silverlight so we really need to have better support for (unit) testing out of the box. As other commenters wrote, other testing frameworks (such as the new support for SL in Coded UI tests) address a different concern and there is still a gap when it comes to unit testing.

• RhysC commented  ·  February 18, 2011 3:46 a.m.  ·  Delete

  How is "Testability" not a primary deliverable for all framework items? I guess i can understand letting it slip in beta or v1, but v4? Seriously?

• Anonymous commented  ·  December 10, 2010 6:18 a.m.  ·  Delete

  TFS integration...

• Peter Gfader commented  ·  October 8, 2010 6:50 a.m.  ·  Delete

  This is very important for my team as well.
  We get around by testing our ViewModels via linked files. Which is UGLY.
  A Silverlight Test Framework not running in the browser would be awesome!

• Andries Coetzee commented  ·  September 8, 2010 1:51 a.m.  ·  Delete

  Integrated Unit testing is a must for for my company. I'm forced to use other Frameworks because of this shortcoming.

• lee.ryan.campbell commented  ·  July 1, 2010 5:02 a.m.  ·  Delete

  I think the lack of built in unit test support sums up Microsoft warped sense of testing. Silverlight can not be taken seriously as a development platform until I can run thousnads of tests quickly (8 minutes is not quick). The main problem here is the Microsoft themselves dont know the difference between Unit, Integration and System testing.

• Prashant Danda commented  ·  April 21, 2010 1:02 p.m.  ·  Delete

  Yes we need to make Silverlight Unit Test Cases written in MS Test be visible in the Test View window of Visual Studio 2010 and also automatically be added to the TFS build definitions...

• bartczernicki commented  ·  April 3, 2010 11:12 a.m.  ·  Delete

  I think they have that in the upcoming Silverlight Control Toolkit drop in April.

• Joel McCormick commented  ·  September 26, 2009 2:24 a.m.  ·  Delete

  Code coverage would be fantastic to! Without coverage stats it's is almost impossible to properly keep track of how effective unit tests are.