47 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your name

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Anonymous commented  ·  August 22, 2014 00:04  ·  Delete…

  Should be included !

• Anonymous commented  ·  October 26, 2013 03:06  ·  Delete…

  Yes! Should be included !

• Subhendu commented  ·  July 01, 2013 10:32  ·  Delete…

  Should be included

• Paul C commented  ·  June 17, 2013 16:42  ·  Delete…

  This would also help in developing consistent experiences for me

• Rajkumar G commented  ·  March 21, 2012 14:00  ·  Delete…

  Would be helpful to tweak the performance

• Alexey commented  ·  October 28, 2011 06:41  ·  Delete…

  Parallel Programming in SL - it would be nice to have.

• LaughingJohn commented  ·  September 14, 2011 03:42  ·  Delete…

  TPL is included in SL5. Don't think PLINQ or Parallel loops (For/ForEach) is included though.

• Dimitar N. L. commented  ·  August 30, 2011 23:31  ·  Delete…

  You should include this feature in SL5.

• Dimitar N. L. commented  ·  August 30, 2011 23:30  ·  Delete…

  You should include this feature in SL5.

• LaughingJohn commented  ·  August 23, 2011 03:42  ·  Delete…

  For anyone looking for this, you can get access to tasks (although not Parallel.For or concurrent collections) via the Async CTP, available here: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=9983

  There's a go-live license as well.

• LaughingJohn commented  ·  August 23, 2011 03:40  ·  Delete…

  +100

• Alireza commented  ·  July 20, 2011 20:29  ·  Delete…

  You should include this feature in SL5.

• Brij Mohan commented  ·  July 11, 2011 03:10  ·  Delete…

  This is one of the missing must have feature in SL.

• iS * commented  ·  June 24, 2011 03:31  ·  Delete…

  Really gr8 to have this in SL5

• User239 commented  ·  June 12, 2011 13:00  ·  Delete…

  Looking forward!

• Ba Bil commented  ·  June 01, 2011 03:57  ·  Delete…

  Should already be in SL5.

• qxsar commented  ·  April 14, 2011 06:10  ·  Delete…

  I can't believe it's still not gonna make it into SL5..

• Jeeradej commented  ·  April 12, 2011 14:43  ·  Delete…

  The inclusion of these features is a must for Silverlight!

• ludo commented  ·  March 16, 2011 06:13  ·  Delete…

  yes

• Steve Solomon commented  ·  January 17, 2011 04:38  ·  Delete…

  What gives, not TPL in Silverilght. Doh